The NHL’s current playoff format and division structure are holding back the sport from delivering the high-stakes, competitive postseason fans deserve. For years, the league has stuck with a divisional playoff format that pits teams against familiar foes too early and creates lopsided matchups, while geographically nonsensical divisions exacerbate travel woes and dilute rivalries. It’s time for the NHL to return to the 1-through-8 seeding model and realign divisions to prioritize geographic logic. Here’s why.
The Case for 1-Through-8 Seeding
The NHL’s current divisional playoff format, introduced in 2014, forces teams within the same division to face off in the first two rounds, often leading to blockbuster matchups too early. This structure has created repetitive playoff slates—think Boston vs. Toronto or Tampa Bay vs. Florida—where top teams eliminate each other before the conference finals. For the past four years, fans have seen near-identical early-round matchups, draining excitement and predictability.
Contrast this with the pre-2014 1-through-8 seeding, where the top eight teams in each conference, regardless of division, were ranked by points and matched accordingly (1 vs. 8, 2 vs. 7, etc.). This system ensured that the best teams were more likely to meet later in the playoffs, creating thrilling, competitive series in the conference finals and beyond. The 2023 Eastern Conference Finals, where the Florida Panthers dominated the Carolina Hurricanes, is a prime example of the current system’s flaws. Florida was so superior that they were effectively load-managing by Game 4, treating the series like a warm-up rather than a battle for the Stanley Cup Final. The conference finals should be a pinnacle of competition, not a cakewalk.
Under a 1-through-8 format, elite teams like Florida, Toronto, or Tampa Bay would be spread across matchups, reducing the chance of early eliminations and ensuring that the conference finals pit the true titans against each other. This would elevate the stakes and make every round feel like a progression toward the Cup.
Realign Divisions for Geographic Sense
The NHL’s current division alignment is a logistical nightmare. Take the Atlantic Division: Florida and Toronto are over 1,200 miles apart, yet they’re grouped together, forcing grueling travel schedules during the regular season and playoffs. Meanwhile, teams like Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, just 300 miles apart, are in separate divisions, diluting natural rivalries. This setup isn’t just inconvenient for players and fans—it’s unsustainable in an era where reducing travel fatigue and environmental impact matters.
Realigning divisions based on geography would streamline schedules and reignite regional rivalries. For example, group Florida with Tampa Bay, Carolina, and perhaps Nashville in a Southeast-focused division. Place Toronto with Montreal, Ottawa, and Buffalo for a Northeast hub. This would cut travel times, reduce player fatigue, and foster intense, localized rivalries that drive fan engagement. The NBA and MLB have leaned into geographic alignments with success—hockey should follow suit.
Fixing Lopsided Playoff Matchups
The current format often produces first- and second-round series that outshine the conference finals in competitiveness. In 2023, the Florida Panthers’ path to the Cup Final included a grueling first-round upset over the record-breaking Boston Bruins and a tough second-round battle against Toronto. Yet, their Eastern Conference Final against Carolina was a letdown, with Florida cruising to a sweep. This imbalance isn’t an anomaly—it’s a feature of a system that forces top teams to clash early, leaving the conference finals vulnerable to mismatches.
A 1-through-8 seeding would better distribute talent across the bracket, ensuring that the best teams are more likely to meet in later rounds. It would also prevent scenarios where a team like Florida, battle-tested from early rounds, coasts through a conference final while preparing for the Cup Final like it’s just another playoff series. Fans deserve conference finals that rival the Stanley Cup Final in intensity, not one-sided affairs.
Breaking the Monotony
The NHL’s divisional format has trapped fans in a Groundhog Day of playoff matchups. For four years running, we’ve seen variations of the same series—Boston vs. Toronto, Tampa Bay vs. Florida, Pittsburgh vs. the New York teams. These rivalries are exciting, but their repetition in early rounds feels stale. A 1-through-8 seeding would shake up the bracket, creating fresh matchups and keeping fans guessing. Imagine a playoff where Florida faces Colorado in the second round, or Toronto battles Vegas in the conference finals. Variety breeds excitement, and the NHL needs to deliver.
The NHL has a passionate fanbase and a product that thrives on intensity. By reverting to a 1-through-8 seeding and realigning divisions, the league can deliver fresher matchups, fairer competition, and a postseason that feels like a true crescendo to the Stanley Cup Final. It’s time to break the cycle of repetitive, lopsided playoffs and give fans the spectacle they deserve.
Leave a comment